The_high court allowed the withdrawal_of_the_writ_petition_on_motion_made_by_counsel,_granting_liberty_to_make_representation_to_protect_petitioner_s_service.
Petition permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to make representation to respondent No.3 for protection of service of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3893 OF 2003
Smt. Sharmila Prabhakar Tandel
.... Petitioner.
V/s
State of Maharashta & Ors.
.....Respondents.
Mr. R.K. Mendadkar for the Petitioner.
Mr. C.R. Sonawane, AGP for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4.
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & V.M. KANADE, JJ. DATE : 21st February 2008.
P.C.:
In view of Government Resolution dated 15/06/1995, on the motion made by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to make representation to respondent No.3 for protection of service of the petitioner. Petition is accordingly disposed of.
2
Smt. Sharmila Prabhakar Tandel
State of Maharashtra
D.K. Deshmukh
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
