HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR…
Petition disposed off with liberty to submit a representation to Respondents no.3 & 4.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
Writ Petition No. 3533 of 2008. Madhukar Sitaramji Dafre & others
v Union of India and another
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders.
Shri N.W. Sambre, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri S. K. Mishra Asstt. Solicitor General of India for Respondent no.1
Coram : B.H. Marlapalle and A.H. Joshi, JJ. Dated : 20 th October, 2008.
1. Mr. Sambre, the Learned Counsel for the
petitioners states that they would submit a representation to Respondents no.3 & 4 so as to permit them to remain at the present station till the end of this academic year.
2. In any case, if such representation is submitted, it is for Respondents no.3 & 4 to consider the same on its own merits, and as per the guidelines pertaining to the transfer policy.
3. The petition is disposed off with liberty to submit
a representation.
2
4. Interim order if any stands vacated.
JUDGE JUDGE
/Muley/
Madhukar Sitaramji Dafre
Union of India
B.H. Marlapalle
A.H. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
