In this bail application, the High Court allowed the prayer for adding an applicant as an additional respondent to the underlying writ petition.
The applicant be added as additional respondent in Writ Petition No. 2701/08.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
C.A. No.6141/2008 in Writ Petition No.2701/2008 Shri Gangadhar s/o Nilkanth Shende and another Vs. The Union of India and others.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders.
Mr. A. Parchure, Adv. for the petitioners. Mr. N.W. Sambre, G.P. for respondent no.2. Mr. C.S. Kaptan, Adv. for respondent nos.3 and 4. Mr. Khandalkar, Adv. for the applicants-Intervenors.
Coram : B.H. Marlapalle and A.H. Joshi, JJ. Dated : 18th October, 2008.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants.
The application is partly allowed in terms of prayer
clause (B).
The applicant be added as additional respondent in Writ Petition No. 2701/08 by Shri Parchure.
Shri Khandalkar, learned counsel waives service for added respondents.
JUDGE JUDGE
Ambulkar.
Shri Gangadhar s/o Nilkanth Shende
Union of India
B.H. Marlapalle
A.H. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
