The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned orders, and made the rule absolute in terms of the prayer clauses, referring to reasons in a related writ petition.
Petition allowed; impugned orders set aside; rule made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vss : 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2916 OF 1995
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda¦ Court’s or Judge’s
of Coram, appearances, Court’s¦ Orders
Order or Directions and ¦
Registrar’s Orders ¦
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.N.V. Walawalkar for the Petitioner
Mr.S.S. Hardikar for Respondent
CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.
DATED: SEPTEMBER 29, 2008
P.C.:
. For the reasons stated in the
Writ Petition No.2892 of 1995, this
petition is also allowed. The
impugned orders are set aside. Rule
made absolute in terms of prayer
clauses (a) and (b).
Petitioner
Respondent
NISHITA MHATRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court