This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vss : 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1185 OF 1995
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda¦ Court’s or Judge’s
of Coram, appearances, Court’s¦ Orders
Order or Directions and ¦
Registrar’s Orders ¦
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.P.O. Verghese for the Petitioner
Ms.P.S. Cardozo, AGP, for Respondent
Nos.1 & 2
CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.
DATED: SEPTEMBER 29, 2008
P.C.:
. The order challenged in this
petition is an interim order. It
appears that final orders have already
been passed and, therefore, the
petition has become infructuous. The
petition is accordingly dismissed as
infructuous.
Petitioner
State represented by the Additional Government Pleader
NISHITA MHATRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court