The High Court at Bombay held that as the term of the Managing Committee of the petitioner society had expired, no relief could be granted in the subsequent writ petition. The petition was disposed of as infructuous.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.2823 OF 2004
-----------------------------------:-------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders.
coram, appearances, Court’s orders :
or directions and Registrar’s :
orders. :
-----------------------------------:-------------------------------------
Mr.Parag Shelkar for the petitioner.
Mr.Jayesh B.Kocheta for respondent no.1.
Mr.A.H.Palekar AGP for respondent no.2.
CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J.
DATED: 25TH FEBRUARY, 2008
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. From the facts as mentioned in the writ
petition it appears that the period of Managing
Committee of the petitioner-society has expired
in the first week of February, 2008 and in view
thereof, in my opinion, nothing further survives
in the instant petition. The writ petition is
disposed of as infructuous.
(D.B.BHOSALE, J.)
Petitioner-society
Respondent no.1
Respondent no.2
D.B. Bhosale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court