Writ petition disposed of as agreed statement by the State. The Court found no further case to answer as the State承诺 to look into averments. Petitioner dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2553 OF 2008
Prakash Tukaram Neel
).. Petitioner
Versus
The Collector of Thane and others
).. Respondents
Mr Sagar Joshi for the Petitioner. Mr R P Behere, Addl. G.P., for the State.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C. J. & A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED: 7TH AUGUST 2008 .
P.C.
The learned Counsel appearing for the State submits that
they will look into the averments made in the Writ Petition and proceed in the matter in accordance with law.
CHIEF JUSTICE
-2-
A. P. DESHPANDE, J.
Prakash Tukaram Neel
The Collector of Thane
Swatanter Kumar
A. P. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
