A PIL petition was dismissed as withdrawn after the petitioner asserted that the Bar Council was already examining the matter and sought no further action.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PIL WRIT PETITION NO. 2062 OF 2005
Manubhai Paragji Vashi. ..... ... ..... Petitioner. Versus Bar Council of India & Anr. ... ..... Respondents.
Mr. N. K. Singh i/by Mr. M. P. Vashi for the Petitioner. Mr. R. Raghuvanshi, Addl.Solicitor General with Mr.Nitin Jamdar for Respondent No.1.
Mr. A. G. Damle for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and A. A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATED : 23RD JULY, 2008.
P.C.:
It is submitted that the Bar Council is looking into the matter and they have already initiated action. Therefore, the petitioner does not want to pursue this petition and seeks withdrawal. This petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
(BILAL NAZKI, J.)
Sd/(A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.)
Manubhai Paragji Vashi
Bar Council of India
BILAL NAZKI
A. A. KUMBHAKONI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
