The writ petition seeking quashing of proceedings was withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The court dismissed the petition with liberty to approach the Magistrate and disposed of the accompanying application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1345 OF 2008
DIST.: MUMBAI Dr. Gokulchand Mammraj Agrawal ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 219 OF 2008 Dr. Gokulchand Mammraj Agrawal ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents And Meghna W/o. Deepak Agrawal ...Intervenor/Applicant Mr. I.B. Singh for the Petitioner Mr. A.M. Saraogi for the Applicant in Application No.219 of 2008 Mrs. S.D. Shinde, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State.
CORAM : B ILAL NAZKI and A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ.
2
DATE : AUGUST 1, 2008
P.C. :-
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition, with liberty to approach the Magistrate. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed.
BILAL NAZKI, J.
A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.
Dr. Gokulchand Mammraj Agrawal
The State of Maharashtra
Meghna W/o. Deepak Agrawal
BILAL NAZKI
A.A. KUMBHAKONI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
