Devyani H.Dave v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/1252/2003
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE…
What did the court decide?
Six weeks to effect service of notice to second Respondent; dismissal for non-prosecution if not taken.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
-1-
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
¶3
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1252 OF 2003.
¶4
..............................................................
Office Notes, Office
memorandum of Coram,
appearances, Court’sCourt’s or
orders or directionsJudge’s orders.
& Registrar’s orders.
..............................................................
¶5
Mr. Vinit Jain, i/b. Girish Kulkarni, for
the Petitioner.
Mr. D.P.Adsule, APP, for the Respondent -
State.
¶6
CORAM: A.S.OKA,J.
DATE : 8TH AUGUST, 2008.
¶7
P.C.:
¶8
1.Time of six weeks is granted to take
steps for effecting service of notice to
the second Respondent. If appropriate
steps are not taken within the stipulated
period of six weeks, the Petition will
stand dismissed for non-prosecution
without further reference to the Court.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
A.S. Oka
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court