Waman Hari Patil v. Special Land Acquistion Officer
Bombay HCCAF/484/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
Issue for consideration
Whether an order restricting entitlement to accrued pension and benefits is a void order.
¶1
-1-
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
¶3
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.484 OF 2008
¶4
IN
¶5
CROSS OBJECTION NO.6959 OF 1991
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.876 OF 1990.
¶6
..............................................................
Office Notes, Office
memorandum of Coram,
appearances, Court’sCourt’s or
orders or directionsJudge’s orders.
& Registrar’s orders.
¶7
Mr.S.P.Thorat, for the Applicant.
¶8
CORAM: A.S.OKA,J.
DATE : 8TH AUGUST, 2008.
¶9
P.C.:
¶10
1.The prayer made in this Application
is for recall of Judgement and Order dated
3rd December 2007 on the basis of the
Judgement and Order dated 3rd September
2004 passed in First Appeal No.106/1991.
The First Appeal and the cross-objection
has been disposed of by the Judgement and
Order dated 3rd December 2007 after
hearing the Advocate for the Applicant.
The Judgment on which reliance is sought
to be placed has been delivered by this
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
AI extract
Whether an order restricting entitlement to accrued pension and benefits is a void order.
Whether any order passed by the department under Article 309 is binding on the department.
Whether the decision of this Court on 3rd September 2004 in the First Appeal was substantively correct.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
Coram
AI extract
A.S. OKA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court