Disposed
Shukala Basu Gautam Sabale v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCWP/112/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 112 OF 2008.
--------------------------------l------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda l
of Coram, appearances, Court’s l
Orders or directions and l
Registrar’s orders. l Court’s or Judges’ Order
--------------------------------i------------------------------
C. K. Talekar for the petitioner.
V. R. Bhosale A.P.P. for the State.
CORAM: S. B. MHASE &
Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE: February 28, 2008.
P.C.
1. Heard. We find that the
petitioner has an alternate remedy to
approach the Magistrate by filing a
complaint. Therefore we do not entertain
the petition. Petition is hereby rejected.
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.)
/2008/VKT/..
Petitioner
State
S. B. MHASE
V. K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court