Mayur Chunilal Patel v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPA/144/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
:1:
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶2
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 144 OF 2008.
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 108 OF 2008.
¶3
--------------------------------l------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda l
of Coram, appearances, Court’s l
Orders or directions and l
Registrar’s orders. l Court’s or Judges’ Order
--------------------------------i------------------------------
¶4
Prashant Patil with U. B. Koshe for the
applicant / appellant.
¶5
Mrs.V.R.Bhosale, A.P.P. for the State.
¶6
CORAM: S. B. MHASE &
Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
¶7
DATE: February 28, 2008.
P.C.
¶8
1. Heard. Delay in filing
appeal is hereby condoned. Appeal is
¶9
admitted. Leave to amend appeal memo.
¶10
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.)
¶11
/2008/VKT/..
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Prashant Patil
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
S. B. MHASE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court