Villayati Ram Mittal v. Slum Rehabilitation Authority
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT
What did the court decide?
Notice of motion allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to raise issues before High Powered Committee.
COURT
Notice of motion allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to raise issues before High Powered Committee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.620 OF 2007
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1685 OF 2006
M/s. Villayati Ram Mittal Vs
Slum Rehabilitation Authority and others
... Petitioner
... Respondents
Mr. A.C. Singh i/by Mr. D.R. Shah for the petitioner. Mr. M.V. More, Assistant Government Pleader for the State. Mr. G.D. Utangale i/by M/s. Utangale & Co. for the respondent No.1. Mr. A.R. Shaikh i/by Mr. Y.V. Nayyar for the respondent No.6. Mr. S.G. Surana for the respondent No.2.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J., DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ.
DATE : 22ND OCTOBER, 2008
P.C.:
The learned counsel appearing for the applicant wishes to withdraw this notice of motion with liberty to raise all the issues raised in this petition before the High Powered Committee. Notice of motion is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
M/s. Villayati Ram Mittal
Slum Rehabilitation Authority
SWATANTER KUMAR
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court