In a matter concerning the restoration of a Writ Petition for restoration of a Company, the Court held that the absence of the petitioner's counsel due to being busy in another court is not a sufficient cause to condone default. The application for restoration was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
MCA (Restoration) No. 797/2006 in Writ Petition No.1207/1992
( Raju Anandrao Samarait and ors. .vs. City of Nagpur Municipal Corporation and
ors. )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders.
=======================================
Ms. M.D. Nagdive, Advocate for petitioners.
CORAM : K.J. ROHEE &, PRASANNA. B. VARALE, JJ. DATED : OCTOBER 21, 2008
Heard counsel for the petitioner.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
Raju Anandrao Samarait and ors.
City of Nagpur Municipal Corporation and ors.
K.J. ROHEE
PRASANNA. B. VARALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
