The appellants instructed counsel not to press the appeal. The court disposed of the appeal as not pressed with liberty to mention.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.108 OF 2008 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.4988 OF 2007
Shri Jaid Samaru (since deceased through heirs) 1. Smt. Saulat Pravin Samaru and others ... Appellants
Vs.
Shri A. Alim A. Hakim
... Respondent
Mr. Indrajeet R. Kulkarni for the appellants.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.A. BOBDE, J. DATE : 3RD DECEMBER, 2008
P.C.:
Counsel appearing for the appellants submits that he has instructions not to press this appeal. Disposed of as not pressed.
Liberty to mention.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.A. BOBDE, J.
Shri Jaid Samaru (since deceased through heirs)
Smt. Saulat Pravin Samaru and others
Shri A. Alim A. Hakim
Swatanter Kumar
S.A. Bobde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
