This income tax appeal was dismissed as the question raised was held to be squarely covered and answered against the Revenue by a previously reported judgment in 290 ITR 641.
Dismissed the appeal held to be covered by 290 ITR 641.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 407 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-IV ...Appellant
Versus
Jyoti Structures Ltd. ...Respondent
Mr. Beni M. Chatterji with Mrs. Anamika Malhotra for the Appellant None for the Respondent.
CORAM : B ILAL NAZKI and A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 13, 2008
P.C. :-
It is stated at the Bar that the question raised in this appeal is squarely covered, and is answered against the Revenue, by a judgment reported in 290 ITR 641. As such, the appeal is dismissed.
BILAL NAZKI, J.
A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-IV
Jyoti Structures Ltd.
Bilal Nazki
A.A. Kumbhakoni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
