The State of Maharashtra v. Mahesh Shivram Pawar
Bombay HCAPPP/324/2008
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
One-order judgment where the respondent defaulted. Admission of a criminal application for leave to appeal with leave granted for eight-day delay, and order for issue of process under section 390 CrPC.
What did the court decide?
Criminal application admitted; eight-day delay condoned; Sessions Court directed to issue process under section 390 CrPC.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
mst
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶3
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.324 OF 2008
¶4
The State of MaharashtraApplicant
versus
Mahesh Shivram PawarRespondent
¶5
Mr.P.S.Hingorani, APP for applicant.
¶6
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND
A.A.KUMBHAKONI, JJ.
¶7
DATE : 12th August 2008
¶8
PC :
¶9
1. Notice has been received by the respondent.
Despite service nobody appears for him.
¶10
2. For the reasons stated in the application,
delay of eight days is condoned in filing the
criminal application for leave to appeal.
¶11
(BILAL NAZKI, J.)
¶12
(A.A.KUMBHAKONI, J.)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
AI extract
Whether to condone the delay of eight days in filing the criminal application.
Whether to admit the criminal application for leave to appeal and issue process under section 390 CrPC.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Mahesh Shivram Pawar
Coram
AI extract
BILAL NAZKI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court