The High Court held that in view of a previous judgment of this Court (ITA No. 56 of 2005), the specific question of law framing before it would not arise. Consequently, the present appeal was dismissed.
Appeal dismissed because the question of law would not arise in light of ITA No. 56 of 2005.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.185 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Ornate Traders Pvt. Ltd...Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta with Mr. P.S. Sahadevan, for the
Appellant.
Mr. Raj Darak, for respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&
R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
DATED: 11TH MARCH,2008
P.C.:
. In view of the judgment of this Court in
Income Tax Appeal No.56 of 2005 decided on 23rd
January, 2008 the question of law as framed would
not arise. Consequently Appeal dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Income Tax Appeal No. 56 of 2005Followed¶12
Commissioner of Income Tax
M/s. Ornate Traders Pvt. Ltd.
F.I. Rebello
R.S. Mohite
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court