Disposed
Mr. Anthony D'Souza v. S T a T E through Public Prosecutor and 3 Ors.
Bombay HCCRMAM/230/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL APPLICATION…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL APPLICATION ( MAIN ) NO. 230 OF 2007
MR. ANTHONY D'SOUZA ... Appellant Versus S T A T E THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents
Mr. Arun Bras De Sa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. C. A. Fereira, Public Prosecutor for the State/respondent No.1. Mr. M. B. D'Costa, Senior Advocate with Mr. J. A. Lobo, Advocate for respondent No.2.
Mr. S. G. Bhobe, Advocate for the respondent No.4.
Coram:R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. Date:7th February, 2008
P.C.
The learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner, upon instructions, states that the petitioner wants to file a comprehensive suit and, therefore, wants to withdraw the present petition. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed of as withdrawn.
R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.
ssm.
MR. ANTHONY D'SOUZA
S T A T E THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND 3 ORS.
R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court