Mr. Imambari Tasagao v. State through Public Prosecutor and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
On an oral motion, the High Court of Bombay at Goa allowed the bail application to be withdrawn and disposed of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL APPLICATION ( BAIL ) NO. 29 OF 2008
MR. IMAMBARI TASAGAO ... Appellant Versus STATE THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND ANR., ... Respondents
Mr. Rajneesh Naik, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. W. Coutinho, Public Prosecutor for the State.
Coram:R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.
Date:10th March, 2008
P.C.
On an oral motion made by the learned Advocate for the applicant, the application is allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed of.
R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.
ssm.
MR. IMAMBARI TASAGAO
STATE THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND ANR.
R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court