The petitioner sought leave to withdraw its company petition. The court allowed the withdrawal without further elaboration.
Leave to withdraw the petition allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 348 OF 2002
M/s. Ramsons Enterprises ..Petitioner
versus
Roofit Industries Limited ..Respondent
Ms. Manisha Vishwakarma i/b. Mr. B. R. Zaveri
for the Petitioner.
Mr. Huzeda Khokhawala i/b. Nankani & Asso. for
the Respondent.
CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J.
DATE : 14TH AUGUST, 2008.
P.C.
DATE : 14TH AUGUST, 2008.
. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
leave to withdraw the petition. Allowed to
withdraw.
(S. A. BOBDE, J.)
M/s. Ramsons Enterprises
Roovit Industries Limited
S. A. BOBDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court