The single judge permitted the withdrawal of an appeal following the parties' compromise in the main suit, finding the appeal to be infructuous and dismissing it as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the grant; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 702 OF 2008
M/s.Akruti Kailash Constn. ..... ...... ......Appellant V/s Naresh Jha & Ors. ........ ......Respondents.
Mr.Saviana S. Banjare i/by Mr.A.R.Mishra, Adv. For the appellant.
Mrs.S.P.Manchekar, AGP for respondent No.11. Mr.A.K.Nandanvan, Adv. For BMC.
CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. DATED: 28th AUGUST 2008.
PC:
Learned counsel for the appellant makes a statement that the parties have resolved the dispute by entering into compromise in the
main suit rendering the appeal infructuous. Hence she seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. Permission granted. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
M/s. Akruti Kailash Constn.
Naresh Jha & Ors.
A.P.Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
