The High Court at Nagpur disposed of a contempt petition after respondent counsel submitted a fresh order superseding an earlier one, which the petitioner accepted as redressing the grievance.
Contempt petition disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.139/2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.133/2008 (Decided)
Kishore s/o Sukhnandan Mawale
..Versus...
Shri Nitin Kumar Khade, Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Akola and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders
[Smt. Neeta Jog, Adv. for petitioner] [Shri Mishra, Adv. for respdt. Nos.1 and 2] [Smt. R.A. Wasnik, AGP for respdt. No.3]
CORAM :- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 06.10.2008
Learned Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 has today tendered fresh order passed by respondent No.1, dated 3.10.2008. He states that this order is in supersession of earlier order dated 11.7.2008.
Learned Counsel for petitioner states that the grievance of the petitioner gets redressed with this order. This order is kept on record and marked “X” for identification.
2
In view of the above statements, which I have accepted, this Contempt Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
JUDGE
ssw
Kishore s/o Sukhnandan Mawale
Shri Nitin Kumar Khade
A.B. CHAUDHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
