The High Court allowed amendment to the chamber summons in the chamber cited writ petition, permitted further replying affidavits to be filed, and disposed of the summons without order on costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 242 OF 2008
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 2100 OF 2007
Generosa A. Annes. .. Petitioner.
vs.
Maharashtra Housing & Area
Development Authority
& Ors. .. Respondents.
Mr. A.T. Margues for Petitioner.
Mr. M.A. Rochiramani i/by Rochi & Rochi
for Respondent No.3.
Mr. Milind More, AGP., for Respondent No. 1.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL, &
K.K. TATED, JJ.
DATE: 5TH SEPTEMBER, 2008.
P.C.
. This chamber summons is taken out for amendment
in the petition. The same is allowed. Amendment to be
carried out within two weeks. Amended copy of the
petition be placed on record and also furnished to the
other side. Respondent are at liberty to file their
affidavits in reply to meet the case of the petitioner
2
within one week. Thereafter the petitioner to file her
affidavit in rejoinder, if any, within two weeks.
2. The chamber summons stands disposed of
accordingly. No order as to costs.
(J.N. Patel, J.)
(K.K. Tated J.)
Generosa A. Annes
Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority
J.N. Patel
K.K. Tated
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court