Single judge bench dismissed review petitions filed in connection with writ petitions concerning alleged title to open space, finding no merit and no error on the face of the record.
Civil Applications for review stand dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.645 OF 2008 IN
REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO.3276/2007 IN W.P. NO.7930/2003
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.646 OF 2008 IN
REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO.3273/2007 IN W.P. NO.7929/2003
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of
Coram,appearances,Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and Registrar’s
orders
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ms S.S.Dwivedi for the applicants.
None present for the respondents.
CORAM : S.A. BOBDE,J.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 11, 2008.
There is no merit in the
applications for review which are liable
to be dismissed. The review applications
do not disclose any error on the face of
the record. Moreover, there is no merit
in the contention, having regard to the
observations of the appellate Court in
the judgement dated 11.9.2003 regarding
the alleged title of the applicants to
the open space. Civil Applications for
review stand dismissed.
S.A. BOBDE, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review applications disclose any error on the face of the record to warrant setting aside the impugned judgment.
Applicants
Respondents
S.A. Bobde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court