Single judge rejected the civil application for review after finding the applicants were not parties to the proceedings, holding them bound by a prior review order dated 18.12.2007.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION (STAMP) NO.7035 OF 2008 IN
REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO.7034/2008 IN W.P. NO.6742/2003
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of
Coram,appearances,Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and Registrar’s
orders
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.Juben B. Gandhy i/b. M/s.Wadia
Ghandy & Co., for the applicants.
Mr.Vivek Kantawala with Ms Ambreen
Saheed i/b. M/s.Vivek Kantawala & Co.,
for the respondents.
CORAM : S.A. BOBDE,J.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 11, 2008.
1. Admittedly, the review petitioners are
in the same position as the review
petitioner in Review Petition No.150 of
2007. The difference is that the present
review petitioners were not parties to the
present proceedings.
2. Admittedly, however, they are parties
to the appeal pending before the Allahabad
High Court. Hence, for the reasons stated
in the order dated 18.12.2007 rejecting
Review Petition no.150 of 2007, the present
application for review is also rejected.
Order accordingly.
S.A. BOBDE, J.
Applicants/Review Petitioners
Respondents
S.A. BOBDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court