This appeal against a writ petition was dismissed in default due to the non-appearance of the appellant on two dates. The court recorded the absence and proceeded to dismiss the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 305 OF 2008
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 6523 OF 1998
Kumbhar Lata Govind ..Appellant
versus
Mahatma Phule Education
Society & Ors. ..Respondents
None for the Appellant.
Mr. N. P. Shimpi for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
S. A. BOBDE , JJ.
DATE : 8TH DECEMBER, 2008.
P.C.
. Heard learned counsel for the respondent
Nos. 1 and 2. None appears for the appellant. The
above matter was on board on 29.9.2008 and 1.12.2008
when none appeared for the appellant. In view
thereof the matter was adjourned for dismissal.
Even today nobody is appearing for the appellant.
Appeal stands dismissed in default.
(DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(S. A. BOBDE, J.)
Kumbhar Lata Govind
Mahatma Phule Education Society & Ors.
DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN
S. A. BOBDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court