The High Court of Bombay admitted a revision application by condoning filing delay and disposed of the application without substantive disposal or specific relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[-1-]
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRI.APPLN. NO.350 OF 2008 IN REVN.APPLN.NO.406 OF 2008
[ The State of Mah. Vs. Shri.Parasnath Rammurat Rai ]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, office Court’s or Judge’s orders
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court’s
orders or directions
and Registrar’s orders
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ms.A.A.Mane, A.P.P. for State
Mr.S.V.Kotwal Adv. for Respondent
CORAM:SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.
DATE :OCTOBER 17, 2008
1. Heard both sides.
2. Sufficient cause has been made
out for condonation of delay caused
in filing Revision Application
No.406 of 2008, hence, delay is
condoned.
3. Application is disposed of.
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]
The State of Mah.
Shri. Parasnath Rammurat Rai
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court