The High Court, Mumbai, granted anticipatory bail and ordered release on bail after the complainant stated that the matter regarding Sections 498-A and 406 IPC was amicably settled and consent terms were filed.
Granted anticipatory bail; applicant directed to be released on bail in Rs.10,000 with one or two sureties in the event of arrest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[-1-]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.300 OF 2007
Shri.Ravi Shrikant Pittie ..Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
...
Mr.Niranjan Mundargi Advocate for Applicant
Ms.A.A.Mane APP for the State
Mr.H.V.Kode Adv. for Complainant
CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.
DATE : DECEMBER 18, 2008
P.C.
1. Heard the learned advocate for the
applicant-original accused, the learned advocate
for the original complainant and the learned A.P.P.
for the State.
2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in
CR No.29 of 2007 registered at Hadapsar Police
Station, Pune. The said case is mainly under
Sections 498-A and 406 of IPC.
3. The learned advocate for the complainant states
that the matter has been amicably settled between
[-2-]
the parties and they have filed consent terms
before this Court in Revision Application No.140 of
2008. In view of this fact, I am inclined to grant
anticipatory bail to the applicant.
4. In the event of arrest, the applicant-Ravi
Shrikant Pittie to be released on bail in the sum
of Rs.10,000/- (Rs.ten thousand only) with one or
two sureties to make up the said amount.
5. Application is disposed of.
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant in a case involving Sections 498-A and 406 IPC given that the matter was amicably settled between the parties.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Ravi Shrikant Pittie
The State of Maharashtra
V.K.Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court