Disposed
Chandrakant B.Garware v. Gill and Co.Ltd. and Anr.
Bombay HCAPPLN/1128/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1128 OF 2005
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1132 OF 2005
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1186 OF 2005.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Office notes, office
memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court’sCourt’s or Judge’s orders.
orders or directions
and Registrar’s orders.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ms.Swati Sagvekar, i/b. India Law Alliance, for
the Applicants, in all Applications.
Mr.M.M.Bhole, i/b. M/s.Mulla & Mulla & CBC, for
the Resopondent No.1, in all Applications.
Mr.J.P.Yagnik, APP, for the Respondent-State, in
all Applications.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, J.
DATE : 09th September 2008.
P.C.:
1.Not on board. Taken on board.
2.The learned Counsel appearing for the
parties agree that by order dated 12th August 2008,
ad-interim relief was continued for a period of 12
weeks.
3.In the circumstances, clause no.4 of order
dated 12th August 2004 is modified. In clause 4,
the word ‘four’ in the line three of the said order
shall be replaced by the word ‘twelve’.
: 2 :
[ A.S.Oka, J.]
A.S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court