The High Court of Judicature at Bombay considered an application for early hearing of Criminal Appeal No. 1281 of 2003. The bench rejected the application as no case was made out and directed listing at its own turn.
Application rejected; appeal listed for hearing at its own turn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 779 OF 2008 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1281 OF 2003
| Ramsubhash Sakkhu Yadav. Versus |
... | ..... | Applicant. |
|---|---|---|---|
| State of Maharashtra. | ... | ..... | Respondent. |
Mr. S. Rao for the Applicant. Mrs. S. D. Shinde, APP, for the Respondent.
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and A. A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ.
DATED : 5TH AUGUST, 2008.
P.C.:
This is an application for early hearing of the appeal. We have gone through the averments made in the application and heard learned Counsel for the parties.
Sd/-
(BILAL NAZKI, J.)
Sd/-
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a case is made out for early hearing of the criminal appeal?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramsubhash Sakkhu Yadav
State of Maharashtra
BILAL NAZKI
A. A. KUMBHAKONI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
