A single-paragraph order where the Bombay High Court condoned the delay of 295 days in filing a Criminal Appeal against conviction and sentence dated 22nd June 2006, passed by the Sessions Judge, Baramati.
Delay of 295 days in filing the Criminal Appeal against the conviction and sentence dated 22nd June, 2006 is condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.613 OF 2008
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 523 OF 2008
Vishal Mahadeo KambleApplicant
Vs.
The State of MaharashtraRespondents
Mr. Yogesh Sankpal & Pramod Kathane, for the
applicant.
Mr. P. S. Hingorani, APP for the Respondent.
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI, &
A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.
DATE : AUGUST 8, 2008.
PC :-
1.Heard.
2.For the reasons stated in the application,
delay of 295 days in filing the Criminal Appeal
against the conviction and sentence dated 22nd June,
2006, in Sessions Case No. 66 of 2004, passed by the
1st Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati, is
hereby condoned.
Sd/-
[ BILAL NAZKI, J.]
Sd/-
- 2 -
[ A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay in filing Criminal Appeal should be condoned.
Vishal Mahadeo Kamble
The State of Maharashtra
BILAL NAZKI
A. A. KUMBHAKONI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court