Shahaji Laxman Gunware v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for reinstatement during appeal pendency in service dispute dismissed; no independent remedy was explored by the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[-1-]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
APPLICATION NO.232 OF 2008
IN
APPEAL NO. 1159 OF 2006
Shahaji Laxman Gunware ..Applicant
[Ori.Appellant]
Vs.
State of Maharashtra ..Respondents
...
None for Applicant
Ms.S.D.Shinde APP for State
...
CORAM:F.I.REBELLO AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE :APRIL 7, 2008
P.C.
1. This is an application by the appellant Shahaji
Laxman Gunware who was in service of S.R.P.F.,
praying that he be reinstated in the service during
the pendency of the appeal. Such relief cannot be
granted in this appeal. It will be open to the
appellant, if he has remedy in law, to pursue
independently and dismissal of this application
would not preclude him from pursuing such remedy.
With this observation, this application is disposed
of.
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ F.I.REBELLO, J.]
Shahaji Laxman Gunware
State of Maharashtra
Rebello F.
Tahilramani V.K.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court