Disposed
Sudesh Maniken Nair and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPA/117/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[-1-]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
APPLICATION NO.117 OF 2008
IN
APPEAL NO.906 OF 2006
Sudesh Maniken Nair
and Anr. ..Applicants
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ..Respondents
...
None for Applicants
Mrs.V.R.Bhosale APP for State
...
CORAM:F.I.REBELLO AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE :APRIL 7, 2008
P.C.
1. The appeal was dismissed on the ground that
office objections are not removed. The applicants
have been convicted for life. There is delay of
450 days in taking out this application. The
applicants are in jail. Considering the cause
shown, delay is condoned.
2. Appeal is restored to file.
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ F.I.REBELLO, J.]
Sudesh Maniken Nair and Anr.
The State of Maharashtra
F.I. Rebello
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court