The High Court of Bombay dismissed a suit filed on behalf of the plaintiffs as withdrawn, settled out of court, and accordingly dismissed a related chamber summons as infructuous.
Suit dismissed as withdrawn; Chamber Summons dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 3222 OF 1996 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 978 OF 2006
Niranjan A. Rawal & Ors.
. .... Plaintiffs.
V/s.
Pawan Kumar Saraf & Ors.
Defendants.
Mr. Aroop Dasgupta i/b. M/s. Jhangiani Narula and Associates for the Plaintiffs.
None for the Defendants.
CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
18TH FEBRUARY 2008.
P.C. :-
On the request of Counsel appearing on behalf of the
Plaintiffs, the suit is dismissed as withdrawn as settled out of Court.
Refund of Court fees, if any, as per rules.
2
In view of the withdrawal of the suit, the Chamber Summons
does not survive and is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
Niranjan A. Rawal & Ors.
Pawan Kumar Saraf & Ors.
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
