Suit No. 3220 of 1996 was dismissed as withdrawn because the suit was settled out of court. The associated Chamber Summons was dismissed as infructuous.
Suit dismissed as withdrawn; Chamber Summons dismissed as infructuous. Refund of court fees as per rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 3220 OF 1996 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 975 OF 2006
M/s. Tinwala Industries.
.... Plaintiffs.
V/s.
Pawan Kumar Saraf & Ors.
Defendants.
Mr. Aroop Dasgupta i/b. M/s. Jhangiani Narula and Associates for the Plaintiffs.
None for the Defendants.
CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
18TH FEBRUARY 2008.
P.C. :-
On the request of Counsel appearing on behalf of the
Plaintiffs, the suit is dismissed as withdrawn as settled out of Court.
Refund of Court fees, if any, as per rules.
2
In view of the withdrawal of the suit, the Chamber Summons
does not survive and is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
