In a writ petition, the High Court of Bombay disposed of the petition after the respondent counsel gave an unconditional undertaking to consider the petitioner's request and pass appropriate orders within six weeks.
Petition disposed; respondents to abide by counsel's undertaking to pass orders within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AJN
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.987 OF 2007
Ajay Ganesh Ubale
... Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India & Ors.
... Respondents
Mr. Anand Grover i/b Ms. Monica Sakhrani for the petitioner.
Mr. R.F. Lambay with Mr. U.V. Kejriwal for respondents 1 to 4.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.
DATED : JULY 16, 2007.
P.C.:-
that without prejudice to their rights and contentions, they will consider the request of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders within six weeks from today.
2. In view of the statement made by the leanred counsel
appearing for the respondents, nothing survives in this petition.
AJN
2
Writ Petition is disposed of.
learned counsel. No order as to costs.
[CHIEF JUSTICE]
[SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.]
Ajay Ganesh Ubale
Union of India
Swatanter Kumar
Ranjana Desai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
