In a Notice of Motion seeking direction to look into pending complaints, the Bombay High Court accepted the respondents' assurance of expedition and disposed of the application with nothing surviving.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AJN
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.229 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2692 OF 2005
Maker Chambers VI Premises Cooperative Society Ltd. & Anr. ... Applicants
Vs.
The Mumbai Municipal Corporation & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. E.P. Bharucha i/b M/s. Maneksha and Sethna for the applicants.
Mr. K.K. Singhvi with Ms. A.K. Savla for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J. DATED : JULY 16, 2007.
P.C.:-
Investigating Agency of the Corporation to look into the complaints
which are pending with them.
AJN
2
Corporation states that without prejudice to their rights and contentions, if there are any complaints pending, the Investigating Agency of the Corporation shall look into them as expeditiously as possible.
[CHIEF JUSTICE]
[SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.]
SWATANTER KUMAR
RANJANA DESAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
