Writ petition regarding claim for permanent alternative accommodation disposed of after respondents undertook to consider the representation within eight weeks.
Petition disposed of; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 876 OF 2007
Jagannath Datta Revankar
.... Petitioner
versus
Maharashtra Housing and Area Board and others ... Respondents
Mr. J.A. Udaipuri, instructed by M/s. A. Bharat & Co., for the petitioner. Mr. S.P. Thorat for the respondents.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
DATE: JUNE 11, 2007 .
P.C.
Issue notice to the respondents. Learned counsel appears
and waives service on behalf of the respondents. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
-2-
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives after the respondents undertook to consider the petitioner's representation within eight weeks?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jagannath Datta Revankar
Maharashtra Housing and Area Board
Swatanter Kumar
S.C. Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
