Petitioner allowed to withdraw criminal writ petition; matter disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive judicial reasoning provided.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-(1)-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.825 OF 2007
Somnath S. Vaidya. ..Petitioner.
Versus
State of Maharashtra
and 5 Ors. ..Respondents.
..
Mr.Vikas Mali, Adv. for the Petitioner.
Mrs.A.S.Pai, APP, for the State.
CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATED : AUGUST 07, 2007.
P.C.:-
. On oral motion made by the learned
Advocate for the petitioner, the Petition is
allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of as
such.
[R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.]
-(2)-
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Somnath S. Vaidya
State of Maharashtra
R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court