This order relates the writ petition to a preceding judgment from the same date. The High Court made the rule absolute in terms of specific prayer clauses of the petitioner, waiving costs, with no substantive analysis in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8235 OF 2006
Coca Cola India Pvt. Ltd. .. Petitioner.
V/s.
The Deputy Commissioner of
Income-tax & Others .. Respondents.
Mr.R. Murlidhar & Mr.Arun Siwach with Mr.Ameya
Gokhale i/by M/s.Amarchand Mangaldas & S.A. Shroff
& Co. for the petitioner.
Mr.A.M. Kotangale for the respondents.
CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 12TH FEBRUARY, 2007.
P.C. :
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By
consent of the parties, taken up for final hearing.
The learned counsel for the respondents waives
service.
2. In view of our judgment dated 12th February,
2007 in Appellate Side Writ Petition No.7459 of
2006, rule is made absolute in terms of prayer
clause (c) & (d) with no order as to costs.
(DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Coca Cola India Pvt. Ltd.
The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN
J.P. DEVADHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court