HIGH COURT OF
notice of motion for condonation of 68 days delay in filing appeal was made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1476 OF 2003
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.423 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai City X .. Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Rockwool Insulation (I)
P. Limited .. Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.
Mr.A.K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 12TH FEBRUARY, 2007.
P.C. :
1. Heared learned counsel for the appellant and
the learned counsel for the respondent.
2. By this notice of motion, the appellant is
seeking condonation of 68 days delay in filing the
appeal.
3. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in
support of notice of motion, sufficient cause is
made out for condonation of delay. There is no case
of any inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on
the part of the appellant.
4. The notice of motion is made absolute in
terms of prayer clause (a).
(DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
2
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
The Commissioner of Income-tax Mumbai City
M/s. Rockwool Insulation (I) P. Limited
DR.S. Radhakrishnan
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court