This writ petition challenged the petitioner's inability to appear for fourth semester exams due to not clearing the third semester. The court dismissed the petition, upholding the admitted lack of merit.
Petition dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 7458 OF 2007
Dhanashree Uday Naik. .. Petitioner.
vs.
The State of Maharashtra
& Ors. .. Respondents.
Ms. Ratuja Ambekar for petitioner.
Mr. C.R. Sonawane for respondent no. 1.
Mr. Girish Kulkarni a/w Mrs. S.S. Deshmukh
i/by Mrs. M.G. Kulkarni for R Nos. 2 & 3.
Mr. Madhav Jamdar for R. No. 4.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL &
SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ.
DATE: 11TH DECEMBER, 2007.
P.C.
. Heard.
2. It is an admitted position that the petitioner
having not cleared third semester, she cannot be
permitted to appear for the fourth semester
examination. Therefore, we do not find any merit in
2
the petition. Petition is dismissed. No order as to
costs.
(J.N. Patel, J.)
(Smt. Nishita Mhatre, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petitioner can be permitted to appear for the fourth semester examination without clearing the third semester.
Dhanashree Uday Naik
The State of Maharashtra
J.N. PATEL
SMR. NISHITA MHATRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court