This petition seeking direction for police license renewal was disposed of without decision on merits as authorities promised expeditious handling.
Writ petition disposed of without decision on merits
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 685 OF 2007
Harishchandra Rajaram Sutar
Petitioner
Versus
The Commissioner of Police, Navi Mumbai and others
...Respondents
Mr. S.N. Gawade, instructed by M/s.Ram & Co., for the petitioner.
Mr. Arun Palekar, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondents.
CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE, Ag. C.J., & V.M. KANADE, J.
DATE: FEBRUARY 05, 2007 .
P.C.
Heard Mr. Gawade in support of the petition.
first respondent-Commissioner of Police, Navi Mumbai, to take a
decision on petitioner' s application for renewal of the performance
-2-
licence. Mr. Palekar, Assistant Government Pleader, is present for the respondents. He makes a statement that the decision will be taken as
expeditiously as possible. In view of this statement, writ petition is disposed of.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
V.M. KANADE, J.
Harishchandra Rajaram Sutar
The Commissioner of Police, Navi Mumbai
H.L. GOKHALE
V.M. KANADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
