Dismissed

Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar Union v. the Security Gurads Board for Greater Bombay and Ors.

Bombay HC5 Feb 2007WP/673/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition filed in February 2007 regarding management discontinuance was disposed of. The court held no relief could be granted when the petitioner joined the discontinuing entities. Subsequently, the petition was allowed to be withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted; petition allowed to be withdrawn.

What the court decided

Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2007)

¶1

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶2

 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

 WRIT PETITION NO. 673 OF 2007

¶4

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of :
 coram, appearances, Court’s Orders: Court’s or Judge’s orders
 or directions and Registrar Orders:

¶5

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

¶6

 Mr.S.S. Pakale for the Petitioner.
 Mr.M.S. Topkar for the Respondents.

¶7

 CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE, ACG. CJ. &
 V.M. KANADE, J.
 DATE : 5TH FEBRUARY 2007
P.C. :
 1. The Petitioners have joined the
 concerned contractor and security
 guards. The petition is filed in
 February 2007. They have been
 discontinued in the management. No
 relief can be granted.

¶8

 2. Mr.Pakale seeks to withdraw this
 petition. Petition allowed to be
 withdrawn.

¶9

 ACG. CHIEF JUSTICE

¶10

 V.M. KANADE, J.

Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar Union v. the Security Gurads Board for Greater Bombay and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar Union v. the Security Gurads Board for Greater Bombay and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Shruti Restaurant and Bar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

M/S. Hotel Durga Prasad Bar and Restaurant Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay Environmental Action Group and Anr. Vs State of Mah. and Ors. and Supreme Infrastructure (I) Pvt. Ltd. (Applicnat)

Dr.Kanhyalal Ghanshyamdas Nathani Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Harishchandra Rajaram Sutar Vs the Commissioner of Police and Ors.

Ansari Muzammil Iqbal Ahmed Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.