Petitioners instructed counsel to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn with rule discharged. Costs directions not made.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 626 OF 1993
M/s. Ghanekar Constructions
Co. Ltd. and anr. ... Petitioners
Vs.
SK Laul & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. Shreekant Ghanekar for the Petitioner.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: AUGUST 21, 2007
P.C.:
. The learned counsel produced a communication
whereby they have been instructed to withdraw the
Petition. A zerox copy of the said letter is placed
on record. Petition dismissed as withdrawn. Rule
discharged. No order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
M/s. Ghanekar Constructions Co. Ltd.
anr.
SK Laul
Ors.
F.I. Rebello
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court