High Court of Bombay at Bombay held that in light of a relevant judgment (267 ITR 488), the question of law does not arise. Dismissed the appeal arose.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 222 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Fascination Network ... Respondent
Mr. Ashok Kotangale for the Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: AUGUST 21, 2007
P.C.:
. In view of the judgment reported in 267 ITR 488,
the question of law would not arise. Hence, appeal
dismissed. No order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
The Commissioner of Income Tax
M/s. Fascination Network
F.I. Rebello
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court