Dismissed
Mali Vishwas Namdeo v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/6074/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6074 OF 2007
.......................................................... Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr. S.P. Thorat for the Petitioner. Mr. Bhalwal i/b. M/s. Vyas Bhalwal for Respondents 2 and 3. Mr, Ajay Joshi for Respondent 5.
CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 17TH OCTOBER,2007.
P.C. :
| . | The learned | Counsel for | the | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| petitioner | cont | ends | that | the |
| respondents | M/s. | A | mbika | Agencies, |
| Mangalvedha | have | given | up the |
|
| dealership | of | kerosene | and |
|
| therefore, | the | block | wo | uld be |
| available | for | offering | it | to |
| public | by | following | the | procedure |
| adopted by | the conce | rned |
respondents.
:2:
| 2. In |
view of | this, the | |
|---|---|---|---|
| challenge | of the |
petitioner to |
the |
| allotment | of | kerosene deal |
ership |
| to the |
subject | block does |
not |
survive. Therefore, the Petition
is disposed of as infructuous.
J.N. PATEL, J.
A.A. SAYED, J.
Unnamed Petitioner
Ambika Agencies
J.N. PATEL
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court