Disposed

Rajhans Narendra Raut and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC15 Jan 2007WP/5989/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the writ petition regarding the stay order on a TDR, directed the relevant respondent to decide the matter after representation within specified timelines, and restrained the petitioner from depositing the DRC during the pendency.

What did the court decide?

Directed Respondent No. 2 to decide the TDR stay issue after hearing within four weeks; restrained petitioner from depositing DRC.

Rajhans Narendra Raut and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2007)

¶1

 [-1-]

¶2

VPH

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY

¶4

 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

 WRIT PETITION No.5989 OF 2006

¶6

 Rajhans N. Raut & Ors. Petitioners

¶7

Vs.

¶8

 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents

¶9

 Dr.V.V. Tulzapurkar, Sr. Counsel for the
 petitioner.

¶10

 Mr. M. P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent no.1 & 2.

¶11

CORAM: F.I. REBELLO,
 AND
 R. V. MORE, JJ.

¶12

DATE : JANUARY 15, 2007.

¶13

 P.C.

¶14

 . Notice waived on behalf of respondent Nos. 1
 & 2. Considering that the order has been passed by
 respondent no.2, this petition is disposed of as
 respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in so far challanges are
 concerned, are only proper parties.

¶15

 2. By an order dated 19th June, 2004 the TDR
 granted in favour of the petitioner has been
 stayed, but without notice to them. In these

¶16

 [-2-]

¶17

 circumstances, it will be open to the petitioner to
 to make a representation to respondent no.2 within
 two weeks from today. Respondent no.2 on receipt
 of such representation and after hearing the
 petitioners and any aggrieved party, to pass
 appropriate order, not less than four weeks
 thereafter.

¶18

 3. In the mean time, petitioner not to deposit
 the Development Right Certificate (DRC) with the

¶19

 Municipal Corporation Pune.

¶20

 [ R.V. MORE,J.] [ F. I. REBELLO, J.]

Rajhans Narendra Raut and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajhans Narendra Raut and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandgad Taluka Shetkari Sah.Kharedi Vikri S.E.H.S Vs the Sub-Divisional Officer and Ors.

Sahebrao Kerbaji Balkhande Vs the Board of Trustees,the Port of Mumbai,and Anr.

Harshad Chandrakant Bagul Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Indrayani Namdeo Gavande Vs the H.M. Nehru Primary Ashram School and Others

Kalpana Deepak Pawar Vs Dnyan Prasarak Mandal and Ors.

Ashok Ramchandra Kashid Vs the Union of India and Ors.